[developers] Expanding a grammar with defaults
fcbond at gmail.com
Thu Feb 26 05:31:07 CET 2009
I believe that approach should work, assuming all defaults are
> `lexical' rather than `persistent'. I'd be happy to try and advise if
> there seem to be problems
The value of *description-persistence* is L, and the only default I could
lexeme := canon-sign &
[ ORTH [ LIST [ REST #last ],
LAST #last ],
SYN [ HEAD.TOPIC /l -,
VAL.GAP <! !> ],
SEM [ HOOK [ LTOP #ltop,
INDEX #index ],
KEY #key & [ LBL #ltop,
ARG0 #index ],
RELS.LIST.FIRST #key ] ].
So it looks as though we are in luck :-).
Is there any way of testing for the existence of persistent defaults?
Francis Bond <http://www2.nict.go.jp/x/x161/en/member/bond/>
NICT Language Infrastructure Group
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the developers