[developers] Follow up: [incr tsdb()] question

Thu Dec 8 07:28:14 CET 2011

yes, i certainly would no longer recommend the 2009 barcelona release.  i thought i had updated the relevant LOGON pages sometime earlier this year (LogonInstallation seems correct), so please point me to other pages that need updating.

cheers, oe

On 8. des. 2011, at 06:26, "Emily M. Bender" <ebender at uw.edu> wrote:

> Dear Varya,
> 
> Yes, you should definitely install logon from
> http://svn.emmtee.net/trunk instead.
> 
> Stephan, is it time to remove pointers to the
> Barcelona release?
> 
> Emily
> 
> 2011/12/7 <gracheva at u.washington.edu>
> Hi Emily and Mike,
> 
> Apparently,I have the Barcelona one (see below):
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> 
> gracheva at ubuntu:~/logon$ cd $LOGONROOT
> gracheva at ubuntu:~/logon$ more .svn/entries
> 10
> 
> dir
> 10298
> http://svn.emmtee.net/tags/barcelona
> http://svn.emmtee.net
> 
> 2010-03-20T22:07:15.401837Z
> 7614
> oe
> has-props
> 
> svn:externals
> _____________________________________________________
> 
> So, I should reinstall LOGON from http://svn.emmtee.net/trunk instead?
> 
> -Varya
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Emily M. Bender wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Taking this off the developers list for now.  Thank you for
> helping us work this out. 
> 
> Varya, to check where the LOGON tree is from, do:
> 
> cd $LOGONROOT
> more .svn/entries
> 
> and let us know what you see there.
> 
> Mike, regarding the hand-editing thing, you can let go of
> that idea.  We very carefully created the data that was sent
> in the original bug report as a reproduction of the problem.
> 
> Emily
> 
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Michael Wayne Goodman <goodmami at u.washington.edu> wrote:
>      Hi Emily, Varya,
> 
>      To be certain, make sure your LOGON tree is from
>      http://svn.emmtee.net/trunk and not the Barcelona tagged release.
>      Also, can you reproduce the problem now? You may have originally
>      created the profile from the skeleton before it was updated, then
>      updated them manually, etc. In other words, rather than trying to
>      figure out why the current profile has a problem, check if the
>      problematic behavior persists on newly created profiles.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Emily M. Bender <ebender at uw.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I'm pretty sure (Varya can confirm) that the profile called
> > Varya-lkb was created from the skeleton included in the
> > attachment (like the Emily-lkb profile).  We tried svn update
> > in her logon directory and nothing needed updating.
> >
> > Emily
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Michael Wayne Goodman
> > <goodmami at u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Emily,
> >>
> >> Here's what I gather from the environment you attached:
> >>
> >> $ diff Emily-lkb/relations Varya-lkb/relations
> >> $ head -n1 Emily-lkb/item | awk -F@ '{print NF}'
> >> 15
> >> $ head -n1 Varya-lkb/item | awk -F@ '{print NF}'
> >> 15
> >> $ head -n1 Emily-lkb/parse | awk -F@ '{print NF}'
> >> 32
> >> $ head -n1 Varya-lkb/parse | awk -F@ '{print NF}'
> >> 30
> >>
> >> I then used Varya's skeleton files to create a new profile, and there
> >> were no problems:
> >>
> >> $ head -n1 Michael-lkb/parse | awk -F@ '{print NF}'
> >> 32
> >>
> >> I'm guessing Varya updated the profile by hand (I recall her talking
> >> about doing so) after it was created, and forgot to add the two empty
> >> fields in parse. If not, she should double-check that she is using the
> >> most recent LOGON version.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Emily M. Bender <ebender at uw.edu> wrote:
> >> > Reattaching the original attachment, in case it's helpful.  Both
> >> > versions of the relations file define 32 fields for parse.  Varya's
> >> > system is giving 30 fields, mine is giving 32.  The error message
> >> > when I try to read the broken profile is:
> >> >
> >> > read_tuple(): arity mismatch (30 vs. 32) or `parse' (1).
> >> >
> >> > I don't know what errors Varya sees.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Emily
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> concretely, how many fields do you get, and how many are
> >> >> defined in the ‘relations’ file?  or, even more concretely,
> >> >> what exact error message(s) do you see when [incr tsdb()]
> >> >> attempts to read the broken profile?
> >> >>
> >> >> cheers, oe
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tuesday, November 15, 2011, Emily M. Bender <ebender at uw.edu> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Following up on the question that Varya and I had before:
> >> >> > The ^M are gone, but we still are not getting to working profiles
> >> >> > on Varya's system (Ubuntu 11.10).  I checked (svn update)
> >> >> > and logon is up to date.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > However, when we run the attached grammar over its associated
> >> >> > test suite on her system, we get a broken profile.  Specifically, the
> >> >> > number of fields in the parse file appears to be incorrect.
> >> >> > (There are two fewer @ signs per line in
> >> >> > tsdb/home/[...]/Varya-lkb/parse,
> >> >> > as opposed to Emily-lkb/parse, done on my system.)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Looking at the run file, it looks like I'm using the 64-bit software
> >> >> > while Varya is not.  Is there perhaps some change that didn't get
> >> >> > made in the 32-bit version?  Or are we barking up the wrong tree
> >> >> > here?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Emily
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Emily M. Bender
> >> >> > Associate Professor
> >> >> > Department of Linguistics
> >> >> > Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> +++ Universitetet i Oslo (IFI); Boks 1080 Blindern; 0316 Oslo; (+47)
> >> >> 2284
> >> >> 0125
> >> >> +++    --- oe at ifi.uio.no; stephan at oepen.net; http://www.emmtee.net/oe/
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Emily M. Bender
> >> > Associate Professor
> >> > Department of Linguistics
> >> > Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -Michael Wayne Goodman
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Emily M. Bender
> > Associate Professor
> > Department of Linguistics
> > Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> -Michael Wayne Goodman
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Emily M. Bender
> Associate Professor
> Department of Linguistics
> Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Emily M. Bender
> Associate Professor
> Department of Linguistics
> Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20111208/62e384c5/attachment.html>