[developers] post-reduction lexical gap

[Emily M. Bender]

I'd take a look at the parse chart for the non-parsing example---is there
something in the morphology that's not working so that you get no edges for
one token in the input?

Emily

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Kristen Howell <kphowell at uw.edu> wrote:

> Thanks everyone. I got this parse error a lot with toy grammars that I
> produced with the grammar matrix. I don't see lfr.tdl anywhere in those
> output grammars. Does anyone know what might be the grammar matrix
> equivalent?
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Dan Flickinger <danf at stanford.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Olga,
>>
>>
>> This error message from ACE occurs when your grammar includes one or more
>> token-mapping (preprocessing) rules which conspire to delete all of the
>> edges from one of the cells in the initial parse chart, so that the parser
>> cannot hope to find a covering analysis.  For the ERG, this occasionally
>> happens when I adjust the rules for inserting lexical entries for unknown
>> words, and then try to filter some of those added entries in case I already
>> have a "native" entry for that word.  I imagine you must have one or more
>> rules in a file like the ERG's "lfr.tdl" which discard some unwanted
>> entries before parsing.  Try commenting out these rules and see if the
>> error message for that sentence disappears. You can see the error just by
>> trying to parse that one sentence directly with ACE.
>>
>>
>>  Dan
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* developers-bounces at emmtee.net <developers-bounces at emmtee.net> on
>> behalf of Olga Zamaraeva <olzama at uw.edu>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 19, 2017 11:07 PM
>> *To:* Woodley Packard
>> *Cc:* developers at delph-in.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [developers] post-reduction lexical gap
>>
>> Hi Woodley,
>>
>> At a risk of asking a basic question: What does a lexical gap mean?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Olga
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:35 PM Woodley Packard <sweaglesw at sweaglesw.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This means ACE encountered a lexical gap.  It should not be a rare
>> occurrence, at least on non-toy data.
>>
>> Best, Woodley
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:21 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>>
>> hi olga,
>>
>> this looks like an error message from the parsing client, not [incr
>> tsdb()] proper.  i would guess maybe ACE?  if so, woodley will likely be
>> able to shed more light on this question :-).
>>
>> best, oe
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 at 19:19 Olga Zamaraeva <olzama at uw.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> What does the message "post-reduction lexical gap" mean in the context of
>> adding an [ incr tsdb() ] profile for regression testing to the Grammar
>> Matrix?
>>
>> Here's the type of line that we sometimes see in home/gold/mytest/parse
>>
>> 10 at 1@10 at -1@0 at -1@0 at 0@-1 at 0@0 at -1@0 at -1@-1 at -1@-1 at -1@-1 at -1@-1 at -1@-1 at 0@0 at 0@0 at 0
>> @-1 at -1@-1 at -1@34728 at -1@-1 at -1@23-6-2013 14:28:24 at post-reduction lexical
>> gap@
>>
>> This seems problematic but we don't really know what it is at this point.
>>
>> (Here's a related topic on Discourse: https://delphinqa.l
>> ing.washington.edu/t/no-parses-when-adding-regression-tests/81/7)
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Olga
>>
>>
>


-- 
Emily M. Bender
Professor, Department of Linguistics
Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20171220/3e37909e/attachment.html>