[developers] Question on using PET/ACE for parsing

[Stephan Oepen]

hmm, what if you disable PoS tagging, i.e. drop the ‘-tagger’ option to
cheap?

oe


On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 23:23 Johnny Wei <jwei at umass.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your response! Is there anyway to prevent sentences like
> "_generic_vbd_ is a person." to be parseable where "_generic_vbd_" is being
> recognized as a "NN" POS generic? Would this require turning off the
> unknown word machinery and adding these generics as lexical entries?
>
> I am interested because the grammaticality of my language model is
> important to me. Thanks! Please let me know!
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>
>> hi johnny,
>>
>> > [...] A sample from my language model might look like
>> "generic_proper_ne had
>> > VBP_u_unknown a cat ." I want to see if these sequences can be parsed
>> by the
>> > ERG.
>>
>> if you look at ‘gle.tdl’ in the ERG sources, it provides the
>> definitions of the generic lexical entries that are put to use in
>> unknown word handling.  for debugging purposes (similar to what you
>> have in mind, i think) they all have a unique orthography—which you
>> should be able to just give to the parser; please see the attachment,
>> for how this works on the ERG on-line interface.
>>
>> best wishes, oe
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Johnny Wei
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20180612/b52216a4/attachment.html>