[developers] 答复: Domain portability claims

[Wang Rui]

there is another (maybe related) one I recently came across for semantic dependency analysis:

http://aclweb.org/anthology/K18-1054


Best,

Rui

________________________________
发件人: developers-bounces at emmtee.net <developers-bounces at emmtee.net> 代表 Emily M. Bender <ebender at uw.edu>
发送时间: 2018年11月21日 23:36
收件人: Yi Zhang
抄送: developers at delph-in.net
主题: Re: [developers] Domain portability claims

Thank you both for the quick replies!

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:40 PM Yi Zhang <ege.yizhang at gmail.com<mailto:ege.yizhang at gmail.com>> wrote:
maybe this one?

http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P09-1043


yi

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:37 PM Emily M. Bender <ebender at uw.edu<mailto:ebender at uw.edu>> wrote:
Dear all,

Do we have a citation to point to yet for the claim that grammar-based parsing is more portable across domains than treebank trained parsing?

Thanks,
Emily

--
Emily M. Bender
Professor, Department of Linguistics
University of Washington
Twitter: @emilymbender
--
Emily M. Bender
Professor, Department of Linguistics
University of Washington
Twitter: @emilymbender
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20181122/162d955d/attachment-0001.html>