<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Ann Copestake <<a href="mailto:Ann.Copestake@cl.cam.ac.uk">Ann.Copestake@cl.cam.ac.uk</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d"><br> <a href="mailto:kiefer@dfki.de">kiefer@dfki.de</a> said:<br> > So what exactly is necessary for the MRS->RMRS conversion?<br> <br> </div>I hope that's reasonably clear from the papers/reports (the Lisp code to do it<br> is reasonably well commented).  One thing - as far as the description of RMRS<br> goes, I suggest looking at the paper in last year's deep grammar workshop at<br> ACL.  The conversion from MRS is quite a lot simpler for the version of RMRS<br> that does not have INGs, which is the one I would advocate these days and is<br> described in that paper.<br> <div class="Ih2E3d"></div></blockquote><div><br>Thanks! I will try to find some time to work on the conversion code in the future.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d"><br> </div>how were you thinking they would be shared?  currently there is Lisp code to<br> do the various formats, so if someone writes a convertor, the Lisp code would<br> have to call that if we share the convertor?  I'm not yet convinced this would<br> make the overall maintenance load easier ...<br> </blockquote><div><br></div></div>It is definitely going to take some extra effort to keep the codes in sync. Following the tradition of ``who commits, who maintains'', I will try to keep the PET MRS code updated. Of course, heads-ups from any relevant upstream change would be very much appreciated.<br> <br>Best,<br>Yi<br><br><br><br>