Dear fellow delph-in grammar writers, Emily and I are working on a paper on linguistic hypothesis testing through grammar engineering and CLIMB. We would like to include some anecdotes from grammar writer's experience on problems while changing analyses deeply embedded in the grammar. We'd therefore like to ask you whether you have some examples of cases where you either: 1) decided not to try out an alternative approach or change an analysis, because it was embedded too deeply in the grammar 2) changing an analysis was particularly labor intensive and complex, because of the same reason 3) you made a decision between alternative approaches only to notice it was the wrong one after it became much more complex to adapt Any feedback or input on these issues is very welcome, level of detail is up to you (though at least some indication of the phenomenon and main issue would be helpful). Thank you very much, Antske