> Perhaps we should not have two "_look_v_1_rel"'s with different > argument signatures in the first place? I though that this was > officially discouraged, ... well, how exactly would you define the ‘argument signature’ of a predicate? i would think we need to allow ourselves a notion of unexpressed arguments, e.g. in the many usages of, say, ‘bet’; or ‘exaggerate’, for that matter. even ARG1s of verbs can be unexpressed: in passives, nominalizations, fragment utterances. once we have unexpressed arguments, i would think there is no formal difference between [ ..., ARGn u, ... ] vs. just no mention of that ARGn role, or? cheers, oe +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++ Universitetet i Oslo (IFI); Boks 1080 Blindern; 0316 Oslo; (+47) 2284 0125 +++ --- <a href="mailto:oe@ifi.uio.no">oe@ifi.uio.no</a>; <a href="mailto:stephan@oepen.net">stephan@oepen.net</a>; <a href="http://www.emmtee.net/oe/">http://www.emmtee.net/oe/</a> --- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++ Universitetet i Oslo (IFI); Boks 1080 Blindern; 0316 Oslo; (+47) 2284 0125 +++ --- <a href="mailto:oe@ifi.uio.no" target="_blank">oe@ifi.uio.no</a>; <a href="mailto:stephan@oepen.net" target="_blank">stephan@oepen.net</a>; <a href="http://www.emmtee.net/oe/" target="_blank">http://www.emmtee.net/oe/</a> --- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++