<div dir="ltr">Thank you Stephan!<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Stephan Oepen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oe@ifi.uio.no" target="_blank">oe@ifi.uio.no</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">the only vaguely related reference i can think of would be the splits used by zhang & krieger (2011), but i seem to recall their test data is actually drawn from WeScience.</p> <p dir="ltr">best, oe</p><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> <div class="gmail_quote">On May 6, 2014 8:02 PM, "Matic Horvat" <<a href="mailto:matic.horvat@cl.cam.ac.uk" target="_blank">matic.horvat@cl.cam.ac.uk</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr"><div>Hello everyone,<br><br>I was wondering if there is a standard (or 'used before') split of Wikiwoods into training/tuning/dev/testing parts that anyone is aware of?<br><br></div>Best,<br>Matic<br> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>