<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
So the process is running out of memory before hitting the limit on
the number of chart edges, which stops processing a little more
gracefully. The LKB batch parse process catches some errors in a
way that allows the rest of the batch to continue. It may be that
all that's happening is that the chart edge limit was set too high
relative to the available memory, although it is possible that
memory is being used in a way that isn't reflected by the edge
limit, which is why I suggested also looking at the token chart.
You could increase the amount of memory available to the process and
see whether you can get your test set through, but unless that's the
final test set and you don't intend to work on any more complex
examples than the ones you have, that's only going to be a temporary
measure.<br>
<br>
I don't think it will matter whether you look at examples that can
eventually be parsed, something that fails after a huge number of
edges or something that causes the memory crash - your task is to
find out whether there is something you can do to cut down the
number of rule applications. The good news is that you won't need
to find many cases of over-application to make a dramatic
improvement. I think you will see the issues with the grammar when
you look at a chart, even with a small edge limit.<br>
<br>
Ann<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/03/2016 01:55, Olga Zamaraeva
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKFA0BXDH1xR27sBWoWtBb0FUginSHFopkEV1s081DJZkM-fKA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Thank you Ann!
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I suppose I should try to pin down an input that can be
successfully parsed, but does produce a huge chart. Of course
my most pressing problem is not that some inputs are parsed
with huge charts but that some inputs can never be parsed and
break the system. But perhaps this is caused by the same
problem (or feature) in the grammar.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The LKB does give an error message, the same memory
allocation error that comes through itsdb when that breaks
(attached in the original email).<br>
<br>
Olga<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:19 PM Ann Copestake
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:aac10@cl.cam.ac.uk">aac10@cl.cam.ac.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I would
say that you should attempt to debug in the LKB. I don't
know<br>
exactly why [incr() tsdb] crashes while the LKB batch
fails more<br>
gracefully (does the LKB give an error message?) but you
should try and<br>
understand what's going on to give you such a huge chart.
That's not to<br>
say that it wouldn't be a good idea to know what the
[incr() tsdb] issue<br>
is, but it probably won't help you much ...<br>
<br>
If you're using the LKB's morphophonology, you might want
to look at the<br>
token chart as well as the parse chart. This is more
recent than the<br>
book, so isn't documented, but if you have an expanded
menu, I think it<br>
shows up under Debug. You want the `print token chart'
item, which will<br>
output to the emacs window. Similarly, if you're trying
to debug what's<br>
going on and have an enormous parse chart, don't try and
look at the<br>
chart in a window, but use the `print chart' option. You
would want to<br>
reduce the maximum number of items to something a lot
smaller than 20k<br>
before you try that, though.<br>
<br>
We should have a FAQ that says `ignore all the GC
messages'. It's<br>
really just a symptom of the underlying system running out
of space -<br>
nothing to do with the LKB or [incr() tsdb] as such. So
there's not a<br>
lot of enlightenment to be gained by understanding terms
like tenuring ...<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Ann<br>
<br>
On 15/03/2016 19:55, Olga Zamaraeva wrote:<br>
> Dear developers!<br>
><br>
> I am trying to use the LKB and [incr() tsdb] to parse
a list of verbs<br>
> by a grammar of Chintang [ctn]. The language is
polysynthetic, plus<br>
> the grammar was created automatically using k-means
clustering for the<br>
> morphology section, so some of the position classes
have lots and lots<br>
> of inputs and lots and lots of lexical rule types and
instances.<br>
><br>
> I am running into a problem when [incr() tsdb]
crashes because of a<br>
> memory allocation error. If I don't use itsdb and
just go with LKB<br>
> batch parsing, it is more robust as it can catch the
error and<br>
> continue parsing, having reported a failure on the
problematic item,<br>
> but the problem is still there and the parses still
fail.<br>
><br>
> I am a fairly inexperienced user of both systems, so
right now I am<br>
> trying to understand what is the best way for me to:<br>
><br>
> 1) debug the grammar with respect to the problem,
i.e. what is it<br>
> about the grammar exactly that causes the issues;<br>
> 2) do something with itsdb so that perhaps this does
not happen? Limit<br>
> it somehow so that it doesn't try as much?<br>
><br>
> Currently I am mostly just trying to filter out the
problematic<br>
> items... I also tried limiting the chart size to 30K,
and that seems<br>
> to have helped a little, but the crashes still happen
on some items.<br>
> If I limit the chart size to 20K, then it seems like
maybe I can go<br>
> through the test suite, but then my coverage suffers
when I think it<br>
> shouldn't: I think there are items which I can parse
with 30K limit<br>
> but not 20K... Is this the route I should be going in
any case? Just<br>
> optimizing for the chart size?.. Maybe 25K is my
number :). The chart<br>
> is the parse chart, is that correct? I need to
understand what exactly<br>
> makes the chart so huge in my case; how should I
approach debugging<br>
> that?..<br>
><br>
> One specific question: what does "tenuring" mean with
respect to<br>
> garbage collection? Google doesn't know (nor does the
manual, I think).<br>
><br>
> Does anyone have any comment on any of these issues?
The (very<br>
> helpful) chapter on errors and debugging in Copestake
(2002) book<br>
> mostly talks about other types of issues such as type
loading problems<br>
> etc.. I also looked at what I found in ItsdbTop<br>
> (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://moin.delph-in.net/ItsdbTop"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://moin.delph-in.net/ItsdbTop</a>),
and it does mention that on<br>
> 32-bit systems memory problems are possible, but I
think that note has<br>
> to do with treebanking, and it doesn't really tell me
much about what<br>
> I should try in my case... I also looked thorough the
itsdb manual<br>
> (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.delph-in.net/itsdb/publications/manual.pdf"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.delph-in.net/itsdb/publications/manual.pdf</a>)
-- but it<br>
> looks like some of the sections, specifically about
debugging and<br>
> options and parameters, are empty?<br>
><br>
> Anyway, I would greatly appreciate any advice! I
attach a picture of a<br>
> running testsuite processing, to give an idea about
the memory usage<br>
> and the chart size, and of the error. It is possible
that the grammar<br>
> that I have is just not a usage scenario as far as
itsdb is concerned,<br>
> but I don't yet have a clear understanding of whether
that's the case.<br>
><br>
> Thanks!<br>
> Olga<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>