<div dir="ltr">Many thanks, Ann!</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Ann Copestake <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:aac10@cl.cam.ac.uk" target="_blank">aac10@cl.cam.ac.uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>the classic paper is Thomason and Stalnaker 1973<br>
    </p>
    <p><a class="m_-3430287892671039089moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4177764.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.jstor.org/stable/<wbr>pdf/4177764.pdf</a></p>
    <p>This gives various tests.  It seems that they classify `usually&#39;
      with `probably&#39; but that they don&#39;t discuss it specifically.  <br>
    </p>
    I don&#39;t know whether there&#39;s an updated version with neo-Davidsonian
    events.  Landman, perhaps?  Kamp and Reyle?<br>
    I can look on Wednesday.<br>
    <br>
    All best,<br>
    <br>
    Ann<div><div class="h5"><br>
    <br>
    <div class="m_-3430287892671039089moz-cite-prefix">On 17/10/2016 20:43, Emily M. Bender
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr">Dear all,
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Following a conversation with Dan and Stephan, I&#39;m
              trying to find tests </div>
            <div>to distinguish scopal v. non-scopal adverbs.  We
              thought that &quot;probably&quot;</div>
            <div>and &quot;quickly&quot; constitute clear cases of each type
              (&quot;Every student probably</div>
            <div>left&quot; / &quot;Every student quickly left&quot;) but we weren&#39;t
              sure how to classify</div>
            <div>&quot;already&quot; and &quot;usually&quot;, and didn&#39;t know what tests to
              apply.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>I&#39;ve tried poking around in Google scholar, but am
              finding myself stymied</div>
            <div>by the fact that people tend to use the word &quot;scope&quot; to
              describe simple</div>
            <div>functor-argument relations (especially when it comes to
              adverbs, it seems),</div>
            <div>and so I thought I&#39;d try asking on-list.   Does anyone
              know of relevant </div>
            <div>work on this question?</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Thanks,</div>
            <div>Emily</div>
            <span class="m_-3430287892671039089HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
                <div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </font></span></div>
        </div>
        <br clear="all">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        <div class="m_-3430287892671039089gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
          <div dir="ltr">Emily M. Bender<br>
            Professor, Department of Linguistics<br>
            Check out CLMS on facebook! <a href="http://www.facebook.com/uwclma" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/uwclma</a><br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Emily M. Bender<br>Professor, Department of Linguistics<br>Check out CLMS on facebook! <a href="http://www.facebook.com/uwclma" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/uwclma</a><br></div></div>
</div>