<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Stephan Oepen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oe@ifi.uio.no" target="_blank">oe@ifi.uio.no</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>> If we are interested in greater uptake of the resource, I would imagine<br> > that an announcement to `corpora' would probably be a good idea!<br> <br> </span>i believe we did that for the SDP collection earlier this year (for<br> which there also was an announcement paper at LREC), and we do in fact<br> see the occasional download and even a couple of reports from people<br> using one form or another of the semantic graphs.<br> <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Do these include full MRSs, or are they all bilexical? (A quick skim of the</div><div>LREC paper suggests bilexical, but it's possible I've missed the key bit</div><div>in my hurry this morning.)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> dan and i have talked about making another announcement once WikiWoods<br> 1214 complements the Ninth Growth; i hope that will be available for<br> download before the summer. though, frankly, i fear there is even<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think that would be a great development!</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> less of consumer base for HPSG derivations and our spindly-looking<br> phrase structure trees than there is for the ERSs.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There may or may not be---some people at least seem to be interested in parsing</div><div>still, not interested in the PTB anymore, and probably willing to modify spindly</div><div>trees into something more compact---but there is certainly interest in </div><div>'semantic parsing', so if the SDP collection does not include the full MRS,</div><div>then that at least could be the kind of addition that would encourage broader uptake.</div><div>Maybe even in Penman format (though I won't encourage Mike to work on that until</div><div>he's done dissertating!).</div><div><br></div><div>Emily</div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="m_-8306415391282270992gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div class="m_-8306415391282270992gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Emily M. Bender<br>Professor, <span style="font-size:12.8px">Department of Linguistics</span></div><div dir="ltr">Check out CLMS on facebook! <a href="http://www.facebook.com/uwclma" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/uwclma</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div> </div></div>