[erg] Missing article in a sentence causes a problem in parsing?
Emily M. Bender
ebender at uw.edu
Mon Sep 16 19:26:36 CEST 2013
Hi David,
The problem isn't the "adjectival nature" but that the
lexical entry for the noun "male" treats it as a count
noun, i.e. one which requires a determiner when used in
the singular. So yes, a new entry would fix this.
Emily
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:39 AM, David Mott <mottdh at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have noticed the following behaviour of the ERG in different variants of a
> sentence:
>
> call from a male to a female ( parses)
> call from man to a female ( parses)
>
> call from male to a female ( *** does not parse)
>
>
> Is this because of the adjectival nature of "male"? Do I need to make a new
> lexical entry for "male"?
>
> thanks
--
Emily M. Bender
Associate Professor
Department of Linguistics
Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
More information about the erg
mailing list