[erg] _certain_q_rel
Paul Haley
paul at haleyai.com
Fri Apr 10 03:24:54 CEST 2015
Hi Folks,
I'm getting the subject relation with non-hole arguments:
* {ARG0=e61[declarative, indicative, ¬perfective, ¬progressive,
untensed]}, {ARG1=x55[individuated, plural, third]}]
for a parse of the sentence:
* Some organisms survive and others die as the environment changes;
this changes the percent of organisms with certain traits in that
population.
Here's the syntactic result of that parse, fyi:
* 'some'('organisms')('survive')('and'('others'('die'('as'('the'('environment'('changes')))))))('this'('changes'('the'('percent'('of'('organisms'))))('with'('certain'('traits'('in'('that'('population'))))))))
The specific lexical entry involved is:
* certain_det := d_-_prt-pl_le & [ ORTH < "certain" >, SYNSEM [
LKEYS.ALTKEYREL.PRED _certain_q_rel, PHON.ONSET con ] ].
And the relation is defined as follows:
* _certain_q_rel := explicit_quant_agr_q_rel.
but I'm stumped on how it's landing up with ARGs instead of normal
quantification arguments.
Does anyone have any thoughts on whether this is proper?
Thank you,
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/erg/attachments/20150409/91ee50f7/attachment.html>
More information about the erg
mailing list