[logon] uio/erg.mtr

[Stephan Oepen]

> I understand, if you do not want to include the new rules into the
> matrix just yet. However, I'd be mightly pleased, if the two revised
> rules could be integrated (provided they pass the test), since that
> woould provide for a nicer deen grammar. 

great, i was hoping the extended FLAGS.EQUAL would allow us to get rid
of this problem too.  the revised rules are now checked in, though not
your additional rules.  i suggest these remain in `deen/erg.mtr', as i
suspect carrying around fully unspecified SF values until late in the
transfer process is not the optimal solution.  could you not distribute
the values in the post-GG accomodation, i.e. when you first introduce
SF values?  in principle, i imagine, a transfer rule might want to look
at the SF value of a clause, and then not having that information local
to the actual event (but rather on a dominating coordinator) would seem
at least inconvenient.

                                                        cheers  -  oe

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++ Universitetet i Oslo (IFI); Boks 1080 Blindern; 0316 Oslo; (+47) 2284 0125
+++     CSLI Stanford; Ventura Hall; Stanford, CA 94305; (+1 650) 723 0515
+++       --- oe at ifi.uio.no; oe at csli.stanford.edu; stephan at oepen.net ---
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++