<p>hi again,</p>
<p>And I need another clarification of "case marking adpositions" of Lab-05. In that section, a type "case-marker-p-lex" is created for case <br>marking adpositions and a particular case-marker-adp lexical entries will instantiate this type and constrain the value of
<br>SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT.HEAD.CASE. But, the matrix has already created a type by the customization script which is for object marking:</p>
<p>;;; Case-marking adpositions</p>
<p>obj-marker := case-marker-p-lex &<br> [ STEM < "theke" >,<br> SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT.HEAD.FORM p-acc ].</p>
<p><br>This lexical entry is accusatively marked by its FORM feature. Now, according to Lab-05, after declaring the feature CASE for +np, do I need to change this lexical entry to constraint the feature CASE instead of FORM? Or I just need to constraint its another CASE feature?
</p>
<div><br>Thanks a lot!<br clear="all"></div>
<div> </div>
<div><br>-- <br>-Altaf </div>