[developers] LKB vs. PET divergences
Ann Copestake
Ann.Copestake at cl.cam.ac.uk
Mon Feb 14 16:45:00 CET 2005
> There's just not
> much freedom to do things differently, or incorrectly.
I recall a series of cases where we had differences in the past. Anyway, do
you have a formal definition anywhere? The situation is analogous to:
a := top.
b := top.
c := top.
d := a & b & c.
e := a & b & c.
where what's happening now in the LKB is that we introduce a glb as follows:
glb := a & b & c.
d := glb.
e := glb.
I am reasonably certain that we discussed this a few years ago and agreed this
was the preferred behaviour, but I am not sure that I could decide for more
complex cases. It'd be nice to have a declarative definition somewhere.
Ann
More information about the developers
mailing list