[developers] LKB vs. PET divergences

[Francis Bond]

G'Day,

Ann Copestake <Ann.Copestake at cl.cam.ac.uk> writes:

>> I've moved the definitions to the rule types (and let the instance 
>> inherit from one type only), and it looks right now.
>
> what's right, in this context?  i.e. did you expect the reentrancy?

We didn't want the reentrency, but I didn't actually expect it to be
blocked. I hadn't thought that far ahead.


-- 
Francis Bond  <www.kecl.ntt.co.jp/icl/mtg/members/bond/>
NTT Communication Science Laboratories | Machine Translation Research Group