[developers] Follow up: [incr tsdb()] question

Emily M. Bender ebender at uw.edu
Wed Dec 7 22:00:19 CET 2011


Good to know we're not alone :) We haven't found a work around
at UW ... we've just been busy with other things.

Emily

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Francis Bond <bond at ieee.org> wrote:

> G'day,
>
> I am getting what is I think a related problem.   On a not quite
> up-to-date logon tree (due to issues with the new pet), I start logon
> and load jacy.  I then create  a profile (mrs) which has a fully
> up-to-date relations file.   I parse it with the lkb.  I then try to
> treebank it:
> ------------
> read_tuple(): arity mismatch (31 vs. 32) for `parse' (11).
>
> create-cache(): write-through mode for `jacy/090705/mrs/11-12-08/lkb'.
> install-gc-strategy(): disabling tenure; global garbage collection ...
> [04:40:44] gc-after-hook(): {L#66 N=8.6K O=179k E=91%} [S=845m R=552m].
>  done.
> flush-cache(): flushing `jacy/090705/mrs/11-12-08/lkb' cache ... done.
> close-connection(): `jacy/090705/mrs/11-12-08/lkb' expiry.
> -------
>
> So it looks as though itsdb is not creating the parse file correctly,
> even without cheap in the loop.
>
> On 7 December 2011 20:23, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> > hmm, i had to check in SVN, but assuming you are using the
> > LOGON 'trunk', the 32-bit binaries were re-generated not too
> > long ago.  i cannot easily imagine that 32- vs. 64-bit should
> > make a difference here.
> >
> > 0 oe at mv (~/src/logon/lingo/lkb) 11 $ svn log linux.x86.32/logon.dxl
> |head
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > r10216 | oe | 2011-10-27 17:28:23 +0200 (to., 27 okt. 2011) | 1 line
> >
> > new 32-bit LOGON run-time
> >
> > the 'parse' relation was indeed extended by two fields a short
> > while ago, so it would seem that the installation that varya has
> > ends up writing the old format.
> >
> > does the 'relations' file in the broken profile contain the new
> > fields (p-input and p-tokens)?
> >
> > since you have been silent about this problem for the past few
> > weeks, has there been some progress in the meantime?  or
> > just patient despair?
> >
> > cheers, oe
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:30, Emily M. Bender <ebender at uw.edu> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Following up on the question that Varya and I had before:
> >> The ^M are gone, but we still are not getting to working profiles
> >> on Varya's system (Ubuntu 11.10).  I checked (svn update)
> >> and logon is up to date.
> >>
> >> However, when we run the attached grammar over its associated
> >> test suite on her system, we get a broken profile.  Specifically, the
> >> number of fields in the parse file appears to be incorrect.
> >> (There are two fewer @ signs per line in
> tsdb/home/[...]/Varya-lkb/parse,
> >> as opposed to Emily-lkb/parse, done on my system.)
> >>
> >> Looking at the run file, it looks like I'm using the 64-bit software
> >> while Varya is not.  Is there perhaps some change that didn't get
> >> made in the 32-bit version?  Or are we barking up the wrong tree
> >> here?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Emily
> >>
> >> --
> >> Emily M. Bender
> >> Associate Professor
> >> Department of Linguistics
> >> Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
> Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
> Nanyang Technological University
>



-- 
Emily M. Bender
Associate Professor
Department of Linguistics
Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20111207/8924bf4f/attachment.html>


More information about the developers mailing list