[developers] DeepBank train-test split?

Emily M. Bender ebender at uw.edu
Fri Jun 7 23:15:09 CEST 2013

Thanks, Stephan.  Is this info up on the wiki (at least
in the form of a pointer to that file) anywhere?


On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> hi megan,
> we propose development (orange) and test (yellow) sections for the
> various sub-corpora in recent Redwoods releases; please see:
>   http://svn.delph-in.net/erg/tags/1212/etc/redwoods.xls
> so, for this release of the WSJ text (DeepBank 1.0), we suggest to
> test against Section 21.
> best wishes, oe
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Megan Schneider <caelum at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Has anyone done a train-test split with DeepBank yet? Is there a preferred
>> test section (or set of sections)?
>> Thanks,
>> Megan

Emily M. Bender
Associate Professor
Department of Linguistics
Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma

More information about the developers mailing list