[developers] DeepBank train-test split?

[Valia Kordoni]

I do not think this info is up on the wiki. we need to add it. testing
against Section 21 is indeed accurate.

Valia

On Fri, June 7, 2013 23:15, Emily M. Bender wrote:
> Thanks, Stephan.  Is this info up on the wiki (at least
> in the form of a pointer to that file) anywhere?
>
> Emily
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>> hi megan,
>>
>> we propose development (orange) and test (yellow) sections for the
>> various sub-corpora in recent Redwoods releases; please see:
>>
>>   http://svn.delph-in.net/erg/tags/1212/etc/redwoods.xls
>>
>> so, for this release of the WSJ text (DeepBank 1.0), we suggest to
>> test against Section 21.
>>
>> best wishes, oe
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Megan Schneider <caelum at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Has anyone done a train-test split with DeepBank yet? Is there a
>>> preferred
>>> test section (or set of sections)?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Megan
>
>
>
> --
> Emily M. Bender
> Associate Professor
> Department of Linguistics
> Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
>


----------------------------------------
PD Dr. Valia Kordoni
Institut  für  Anglistik  und  Amerikanistik
Humboldt-Universität Berlin
Unter den Linden 6, 10117 Berlin
Raum: 2108
Tel.:  +49/302093-2421    Fax: -2244
----------------------------------------