[developers] LUI binaries in the main LKB repository
Woodley Packard
sweaglesw at sweaglesw.org
Fri Jan 15 21:31:26 CET 2016
Thanks for spearheading this. That all sounds right to me.
-Woodley
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>
> hi again, david and woodley,
>
>> while synchronizing versions in the LOGON tree vs. the main (or LinGO)
>> SVN repository for the LKB, i noticed that the main repository still
>> appears to feature separate ‘yzlui’ and ‘pangolui’ binaries, both
>> several years older than the unified, pango-enabled ‘yzlui’ binaries
>> in the LOGON tree.
>>
>> i suspect the LOGON versions have been comparatively widely tested
>> since they were last updated (in march 2014, i believe while woodley
>> was visiting here), and i am not aware of any known compatibility
>> issues. i suspect the LinGO builds possibly get most used in grammar
>> engineering classes at UW (and by other users of your bootable cd
>> distribution).
>>
>> would you want me to propagate the latest LUI binaries into the LKB trunk now?
>
> per request by emily, i just applied the above propagation of LUI
> binaries, i.e. the old ‘pangolui’ binaries in the LKB trunk are now
> gone, and the ‘yzlui’ binaries updated to current versions, which
> include pango support.
>
> david, may i suggest you remove the ‘pangolui’ patches you had applied
> in your build set-up and re-generate a fresh ‘test’ build of the LinGO
> collection?
>
> all, while at it, i also purged all binaries and libraries for Solaris
> and for PPC architectures from the LKB trunk. for all i know, these
> platforms hardly exist anymore, and either way those binaries have not
> been maintained and tested in close to a decade now.
>
> with thanks in advance, oe
More information about the developers
mailing list