[developers] Sweaglesw ERG binaries don't include SEM-I?

[Emily M. Bender]

Finally caught up on this thread so far --- I just wanted to interject that
my proposal concretely is that definiteness correspond to a variable
property (this is inspired by Borthen & Haugereid 2005) and that
demonstratives
involve additional (adjective-like) EPs.

Emily

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:

> > I could imagine a runtime option to the generator saying something along
> the lines of "please apply the following patches to the SEM-I before
> starting," as opposed to requiring the changes to be compiled into an ACE
> ERG image to be used only for JaEn, for instance.
>
> yes, i had come to think along similar lines last night already :-).
> adding an ‘include’ statement to one of the files of the grammar still
> felt a tad more intrusive than would seem optimal (to a purist, at
> least), even more so if one were to imagine that a user might want to
> experiment with multiple such custom hierarchies in parallel ...
>
> oe
>



-- 
Emily M. Bender
Professor and Acting Chair
Department of Linguistics
Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20170315/4ca430b9/attachment.html>