[developers] Sweaglesw ERG binaries don't include SEM-I?

[Francis Bond]

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:

> yes, i had come to think along similar lines last night already :-).
> adding an ‘include’ statement to one of the files of the grammar still
> felt a tad more intrusive than would seem optimal (to a purist, at
> least), even more so if one were to imagine that a user might want to
> experiment with multiple such custom hierarchies in parallel ...
>

I agree that being able to load at runtime would be even better.


-- 
Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
Nanyang Technological University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20170315/ed7cf068/attachment.html>