[developers] [ACE] [JACY] neg_x cfrom cto = -1. is this a bug?
Woodley Packard
sweaglesw at sweaglesw.org
Fri Jul 28 17:27:28 CEST 2017
Hi Tuấn Anh,
This can happen if the CFROM/CTO attributes in the AVM are never specialized to specific values like "4" or "13". In this case, it appears to me that the lexeme "janai-cop-stem" does not do this. Do you observe different behavior from LKB or PET?
Best of luck,
Woodley
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:38 PM, Tuấn Anh Lê <tuananh.ke at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there anyone working with JACY and ACE. Sometimes cfrom and cto of predicates are missing. For example, when I parse these two sentences:
>
> 猫 が 好き じゃ ない 。
> 猫 が あり ませ ん 。
> Both will produce a neg_x relation, but the neg_x one in the first sentence doesn't have cfrom and cto.
>
> [ TOP: h0
> RELS: < [ udef_q_rel<0:1> LBL: h1 ARG0: x5 [ x PERS: 3 ] RSTR: h8 ]
> [ _neko_n_rel<0:1> LBL: h2 ARG0: x5 ]
> [ _suki_a_1_rel<4:6> LBL: h3 ARG0: e6 [ e TENSE: pres PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG2: x5 ]
> [ neg_x_rel<-1:-1> LBL: h4 ARG0: e7 [ e TENSE: tense PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: h9 ] >
> HCONS: < h0 qeq h4 h8 qeq h2 h9 qeq h3 > ]
> [ TOP: h0
> RELS: < [ udef_q_rel<0:1> LBL: h1 ARG0: x5 [ x PERS: 3 ] RSTR: h8 ]
> [ _neko_n_rel<0:1> LBL: h2 ARG0: x5 ]
> [ _exist_v_rel<4:6> LBL: h3 ARG0: e6 [ e TENSE: pres PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: x5 ]
> [ neg_x_rel<7:11> LBL: h4 ARG0: e7 [ e TENSE: tense PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: h9 ] >
> HCONS: < h0 qeq h4 h8 qeq h2 h9 qeq h3 > ]
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20170728/eb06d496/attachment.html>
More information about the developers
mailing list