[developers] [ACE] [JACY] neg_x cfrom cto = -1. is this a bug?

[Tuấn Anh Lê]

Hi Woodley, thanks for answering. I can't seem to load the grammar on my
LKB, but logon has never really worked on my laptop for some reasons so may
be it's my machine (it does load ERG though). I don't know how to use PET
so I can't talk for it.

When I load JACY on my laptop, there is this error message that shows up
every time.

Reading in type file fundamentals
[23:59:36] gc-after-hook(): {L#30 N=1.2M O=0 E=97%} [S=2.2G R=150M].

WARNING: Type `EXTRACTED-ADJ-PHRASE' redefined.
WARNING: Type `BASIC-HEAD-FILLER-PHRASE' redefined.
WARNING: Type `GAP' redefined.
WARNING: Type `CONJ-REF-IND' redefined.
WARNING: Type `GENERIC_ENTITY_REL' redefined.
Reading in type file rule-types
Reading in type file principles
Reading in type file letypes
[23:59:37] gc-after-hook(): {L#31 N=3.3M O=0 E=97%} [S=2.2G R=277M].

Syntax error at position 437529: Coreference NEG_X_REL only used once
Reading in type file mtr
Reading in type file tmt
Error: Syntax error(s) in type file

Restart actions (select using :continue):
 0: Cancel load
 1: retry the load of /home/tuananh/workspace/jacy/lkb/script.common
 2: skip loading /home/tuananh/workspace/jacy/lkb/script.common
 3: retry the load of ~/wk/jacy/lkb/script
 4: skip loading ~/wk/jacy/lkb/script
 5: Return to Top Level (an "abort" restart).
 6: Abort entirely from this (lisp) process.

[changing package from "TSDB" to "LKB"]
[1c] LKB(3):



On 28 July 2017 at 23:27, Woodley Packard <sweaglesw at sweaglesw.org> wrote:

> Hi Tuấn Anh,
>
> This can happen if the CFROM/CTO attributes in the AVM are never
> specialized to specific values like "4" or "13".  In this case, it appears
> to me that the lexeme "janai-cop-stem" does not do this.  Do you observe
> different behavior from LKB or PET?
>
> Best of luck,
> Woodley
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:38 PM, Tuấn Anh Lê <tuananh.ke at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there anyone working with JACY and ACE. Sometimes cfrom and cto of
> predicates are missing. For example, when I parse these two sentences:
>
>
>    - 猫 が 好き じゃ ない 。
>    - 猫 が あり ませ ん 。
>
> Both will produce a neg_x relation, but the neg_x one in the first
> sentence doesn't have cfrom and cto.
>
>
>    -
>
>    [ TOP: h0  RELS: < [ udef_q_rel<0:1> LBL: h1 ARG0: x5 [ x PERS: 3 ] RSTR: h8 ]
>              [ _neko_n_rel<0:1> LBL: h2 ARG0: x5 ]
>              [ _suki_a_1_rel<4:6> LBL: h3 ARG0: e6 [ e TENSE: pres PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG2: x5 ]
>              [ *neg_x_rel<-1:-1>* LBL: h4 ARG0: e7 [ e TENSE: tense PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: h9 ] >  HCONS: < h0 qeq h4 h8 qeq h2 h9 qeq h3 > ]
>
>    -
>
>    [ TOP: h0  RELS: < [ udef_q_rel<0:1> LBL: h1 ARG0: x5 [ x PERS: 3 ] RSTR: h8 ]
>              [ _neko_n_rel<0:1> LBL: h2 ARG0: x5 ]
>              [ _exist_v_rel<4:6> LBL: h3 ARG0: e6 [ e TENSE: pres PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: x5 ]
>              [ neg_x_rel<7:11> LBL: h4 ARG0: e7 [ e TENSE: tense PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: h9 ] >  HCONS: < h0 qeq h4 h8 qeq h2 h9 qeq h3 > ]
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Yours,
-- 
Tuan Anh Le
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20170729/3cd0439e/attachment.html>