[developers] [ACE] [JACY] neg_x cfrom cto = -1. is this a bug?

[Michael Wayne Goodman]

Tuấn Anh, when did you get your version of Jacy? Francis and I noticed
errors like that when there was a solitary coreference #tag in an AVM (ACE
didn't mind as much as the LKB), but I thought we'd fixed them all. Make
sure your version of Jacy is up to date and try again?

On Jul 28, 2017 09:01, "Tuấn Anh Lê" <tuananh.ke at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Woodley, thanks for answering. I can't seem to load the grammar on my
> LKB, but logon has never really worked on my laptop for some reasons so may
> be it's my machine (it does load ERG though). I don't know how to use PET
> so I can't talk for it.
>
> When I load JACY on my laptop, there is this error message that shows up
> every time.
>
> Reading in type file fundamentals
> [23:59:36] gc-after-hook(): {L#30 N=1.2M O=0 E=97%} [S=2.2G R=150M].
>
> WARNING: Type `EXTRACTED-ADJ-PHRASE' redefined.
> WARNING: Type `BASIC-HEAD-FILLER-PHRASE' redefined.
> WARNING: Type `GAP' redefined.
> WARNING: Type `CONJ-REF-IND' redefined.
> WARNING: Type `GENERIC_ENTITY_REL' redefined.
> Reading in type file rule-types
> Reading in type file principles
> Reading in type file letypes
> [23:59:37] gc-after-hook(): {L#31 N=3.3M O=0 E=97%} [S=2.2G R=277M].
>
> Syntax error at position 437529: Coreference NEG_X_REL only used once
> Reading in type file mtr
> Reading in type file tmt
> Error: Syntax error(s) in type file
>
> Restart actions (select using :continue):
>  0: Cancel load
>  1: retry the load of /home/tuananh/workspace/jacy/lkb/script.common
>  2: skip loading /home/tuananh/workspace/jacy/lkb/script.common
>  3: retry the load of ~/wk/jacy/lkb/script
>  4: skip loading ~/wk/jacy/lkb/script
>  5: Return to Top Level (an "abort" restart).
>  6: Abort entirely from this (lisp) process.
>
> [changing package from "TSDB" to "LKB"]
> [1c] LKB(3):
>
>
>
> On 28 July 2017 at 23:27, Woodley Packard <sweaglesw at sweaglesw.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tuấn Anh,
>>
>> This can happen if the CFROM/CTO attributes in the AVM are never
>> specialized to specific values like "4" or "13".  In this case, it appears
>> to me that the lexeme "janai-cop-stem" does not do this.  Do you observe
>> different behavior from LKB or PET?
>>
>> Best of luck,
>> Woodley
>>
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:38 PM, Tuấn Anh Lê <tuananh.ke at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there anyone working with JACY and ACE. Sometimes cfrom and cto of
>> predicates are missing. For example, when I parse these two sentences:
>>
>>
>>    - 猫 が 好き じゃ ない 。
>>    - 猫 が あり ませ ん 。
>>
>> Both will produce a neg_x relation, but the neg_x one in the first
>> sentence doesn't have cfrom and cto.
>>
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    [ TOP: h0  RELS: < [ udef_q_rel<0:1> LBL: h1 ARG0: x5 [ x PERS: 3 ] RSTR: h8 ]
>>              [ _neko_n_rel<0:1> LBL: h2 ARG0: x5 ]
>>              [ _suki_a_1_rel<4:6> LBL: h3 ARG0: e6 [ e TENSE: pres PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG2: x5 ]
>>              [ *neg_x_rel<-1:-1>* LBL: h4 ARG0: e7 [ e TENSE: tense PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: h9 ] >  HCONS: < h0 qeq h4 h8 qeq h2 h9 qeq h3 > ]
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    [ TOP: h0  RELS: < [ udef_q_rel<0:1> LBL: h1 ARG0: x5 [ x PERS: 3 ] RSTR: h8 ]
>>              [ _neko_n_rel<0:1> LBL: h2 ARG0: x5 ]
>>              [ _exist_v_rel<4:6> LBL: h3 ARG0: e6 [ e TENSE: pres PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: x5 ]
>>              [ neg_x_rel<7:11> LBL: h4 ARG0: e7 [ e TENSE: tense PROG: - PASS: - PERF: - ASPECT: default_aspect MOOD: indicative SF: prop ] ARG1: h9 ] >  HCONS: < h0 qeq h4 h8 qeq h2 h9 qeq h3 > ]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Yours,
> --
> Tuan Anh Le
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20170728/e1ee9fb6/attachment-0001.html>