[developers] semantic representations in RDF

[Alexandre Rademaker]

Hi Stephan,

By current interface I mean the one I was able to run in my local machine taking the current version of the code in:

http://svn.delph-in.net/wsi/trunk

Documentation of the query language WQL in http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2015/task18/index.php?id=search is not clear about the operators vs format they support. I was expecting that regex would work in the predicates of EDS or MRS. So a query `x: _fight*[ARG* y]` could match a sentence with a predicate `_fight_v_1`. 

Emily,

You mentioned that you have an instance of the wsearch interface running too. Are you using the same code of the repository above? Do you know about any update/branch of this code? I am planning to work on:

1. New code (not java based) for transform the semantic representations to RDF
2. New code (not java based) to transform WQL to SPARQL.

Best,
Alexandre


> On 13 Jul 2020, at 21:25, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> 
> hi alexandre,
> 
>> 6) The query language (WQL) documented in http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2015/task18/index.php?id=search and [w4] is not working in the current version of the interface:
>> 
>> Accept =>    x: _*  [ARG* x]
>> Reject =>    x: _fight*  [ARG* x]
>> Reject =>    /v[ARG* x]
>> Reject =>    +dog
> 
> what do you actually consider the 'current interface' in this context?
> the WQL documentation you reference is from the SDP shared task, so
> you would have to try those queries against one of the bi-lexical
> formats (e.g. DM :-): the '/' (PoS) and '+' (lemma) operators are only
> defined for SDP graphs, i suspect.  also, 'v' is not a valid PoS value
> (but 'v*' seems to work):
> 
> http://wesearch.delph-in.net/sdp/search.jsp
> 
> see you tomorrow!  oe