[developers] Abstract Wikipedia

[Kiril Simov]

They also are using word embeddings together with
their grammar for selection of the appropriate
lexical forms.

With best regards,

Kiril

>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Francis Bond <bond at ieee.org>
>  To: Alexandre Rademaker <arademaker at gmail.com>
>  Cc: developers <developers at delph-in.net>
>  Subject: Re: [developers] Abstract Wikipedia
>  Sent: 10 Sep '20 14:36
>  
>  I think it is true. GF did a lot of vocabulary acquisition based on
>  OMW 1.0 (some of my students helped) so they have vocab linked to
>  synsets, as well as their own internal semantic hierarchy.
>  
>  Their actual grammars are a lot more basic than the ERG, and of course
>  the coverage varies from language to language.
>  
>  On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:07 PM Alexandre Rademaker
>  <arademaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>  > https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia
>  >
>  > The goal of ABSTRACT WIKIPEDIA is to let more people share in more
>  > knowledge in more languages. Abstract Wikipedia is an extension of
>  > Wikidata. In Abstract Wikipedia, people can create and maintain
>  > Wikipedia articles in a language-independent way. A Wikipedia in a
>  > language can translate this language-independent article into its
>  > language. Code does the translation.
>  >
>  > The Grammatical Framework community provided some response and
>  > suggestion on how GF could be used for language generation
>  >
>  >
>  
https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abstract_Wikipedia#Response_from_the_Grammatical_Framework_community
>  >
>  >
>  > I wonder if the statement about HPSG is fair:
>  >
>  >> check out other grammar formalisms, like HPSG, you'll see similar
>  >> coverage to GF, but no unified API for different languages.
>  >
>  > Alexandre
>  >
>  > Sent from my iPhone
>  
>  --
>  
>  Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
>  Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
>  Nanyang Technological University
>