[developers] Abstract Wikipedia

[Francis Bond]

I think it is true.   GF did a lot of vocabulary acquisition based on OMW
1.0 (some of my students helped) so they have vocab linked to synsets, as
well as their own internal semantic hierarchy.

Their actual grammars are a lot more basic than the ERG, and of course the
coverage varies from language to language.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:07 PM Alexandre Rademaker <arademaker at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia
>
> The goal of *Abstract Wikipedia* is to let more people share in more
> knowledge in more languages. Abstract Wikipedia is an extension of
> Wikidata. In Abstract Wikipedia, people can create and maintain Wikipedia
> articles in a language-independent way. A Wikipedia in a language can
> translate this language-independent article into its language. Code does
> the translation.
>
> The Grammatical Framework community provided some response and suggestion
> on how GF could be used for language generation
>
>
> https://meta.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abstract_Wikipedia#Response_from_the_Grammatical_Framework_community
>
> I wonder if  the statement about HPSG is fair:
>
> check out other grammar formalisms, like HPSG
> <http://moin.delph-in.net/GrammarCatalogue>, you'll see similar coverage
> to GF, but no unified API for different languages.
>
>
> Alexandre
> Sent from my iPhone
>


-- 
Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
Nanyang Technological University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20200910/74aba532/attachment.html>