[lkb] SPPP
avner_g
aglv02 at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 26 02:08:04 CEST 2006
>>> Is SPPP the only way to pass ambiguous morphological output to the LKB?
You may want to download documents at www.kodaxil.org (as pdf file).
A partial answer to text analysis in various languages is provided,
including Hebrew
Avner Levy
Emily M. Bender wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Some colleagues and I are trying to figure out SPPP, in the context of
> hooking up a morphological analyzer for Hebrew (U. Haifa/Shuly
> Wintner) to a Hebrew grammar based on the Matrix (UW/Margalit
> Zabludowski). We would like to preserve the ambiguity found by the
> morphological analyzer and let the (syntactic) grammar disambiguate as
> it can. Thus, SPPP looks like it might be the right way to go.
>
> However, from the wiki page (LkbSppp), it seems like SPPP is expecting
> the external binary to be able to produce output that corresponds to
> LKB rules rather than (say) a lattice of segmentations of the input
> form. Is the general idea to take such a form-based lattice and then
> (with another, still external, script) change them to SPPP XML with
> the LKB rule identifiers projected from the forms themselves? Does
> anyone have any such XML-generating code lying around that we could
> work from? Is SPPP the only way to pass ambiguous morphological output
> to the LKB?
>
> Thanks,
> Emily
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SPPP-tf2028781.html#a6498029
Sent from the Linguistic Knowledge Builder (LKB) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the lkb
mailing list