[pet] lex-exhaustive parsing

[Stephan Oepen]

i have come around to the point of view that the two-phase setup to  
parsing (as bernd has advocated since the early 1990s :-) is superior,  
even though the LKB does not use that
approach.  so, from my pount of view, i see no reason to not always  
turn on lex-exhaustive.  however, i also feel there are many small  
variations and options in how to run PET, and we should elimunate  
legacy code wherever possible.  hence my preference would be to ditch  
the lex-exhaustive option completely, and all code that is used in one- 
phase parsing only.

best, oe



On Aug 20, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Peter Adolphs <Peter.Adolphs at dfki.de>  
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Could we make exhaustive lexical parsing obligatory? It's required  
> for chart
> mapping by definition (otherwise lexical filtering doesn't make  
> sense) and it's
> also useful for the traditional generic instantiation. So why have  
> it optional?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> -- 
> Peter Adolphs
> DFKI GmbH, Projektbuero Berlin, Alt-Moabit 91c, D-10559 Berlin
> Telefon: 030 / 3949-1826
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
> Firmensitz: Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
>
> Geschaeftsfuehrung:
> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
> Dr. Walter Olthoff
>
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
>
> Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313