[pet] lex-exhaustive parsing

[Berthold Crysmann]

On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 11:07 +0200, Stephan Oepen wrote:
> i have come around to the point of view that the two-phase setup to  
> parsing (as bernd has advocated since the early 1990s :-) is superior,  
> even though the LKB does not use that
> approach.  so, from my pount of view, i see no reason to not always  
> turn on lex-exhaustive.  however, i also feel there are many small  
> variations and options in how to run PET, and we should elimunate  
> legacy code wherever possible.  hence my preference would be to ditch  
> the lex-exhaustive option completely, and all code that is used in one- 
> phase parsing only.
> 

What about incremental left-to-right parsing?

B

> best, oe
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 20, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Peter Adolphs <Peter.Adolphs at dfki.de>  
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > Could we make exhaustive lexical parsing obligatory? It's required  
> > for chart
> > mapping by definition (otherwise lexical filtering doesn't make  
> > sense) and it's
> > also useful for the traditional generic instantiation. So why have  
> > it optional?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > -- 
> > Peter Adolphs
> > DFKI GmbH, Projektbuero Berlin, Alt-Moabit 91c, D-10559 Berlin
> > Telefon: 030 / 3949-1826
> > _______________________________________________________________
> >
> > Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
> > Firmensitz: Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
> >
> > Geschaeftsfuehrung:
> > Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
> > Dr. Walter Olthoff
> >
> > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
> > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
> >
> > Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313