[developers] PET MRS output question

[Berthold Crysmann]

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 21:57 +0200, Stephan Oepen wrote:
> hi prescott,
> 
> assuming you compiled a recent revision off the 'trunk' and did
> not active ECL support, i guess you may want to try -mrs=new,
> which will activate the native C++ MRS code in PET, instead of
> the original Lisp code (which can be compiled in through ECL).
> 
> in ongoing development, ECL support is on its way out, and we
> will then consolidate the set of valid values for the -mrs option.
> 

Does that mean, we will get native C++ support for non-XML versions of
MRS as well?

Cheers, 

Berthold

> best, oe
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 21:38, Prescott Klassen <klassp at uw.edu> wrote:
> > Dear PET Developers,
> >
> > I recently built PET from source with all default configuration options plus
> > an additional option --with-xml=yes. My goal was to output MRS and RMRS in
> > XML from an FSC input file.
> >
> > I copied the FSC sample from the PET Wiki page and am using the following
> > command line to test output:
> >
> > cat input.fsc | cheap -tok=fsc -default-les=all -cm -packing -mrs -results=1
> > /home/prescott/delphin/erg/english.grm
> >
> > It produces MRS output. When I use the -mrs=mrx option (or any of the other
> > -mrs=ARG options) no output results. Do I need additional configure options
> > set or do I need to use other parameters to redirect output?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Prescott Klassen
> > University of Washington
> >
> 
> 
>