[developers] DeepBank train-test split?

[Megan Schneider]

Thanks!

Megan


On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Valia Kordoni <
evangelia.kordoni at anglistik.hu-berlin.de> wrote:

> I do not think this info is up on the wiki. we need to add it. testing
> against Section 21 is indeed accurate.
>
> Valia
>
> On Fri, June 7, 2013 23:15, Emily M. Bender wrote:
> > Thanks, Stephan.  Is this info up on the wiki (at least
> > in the form of a pointer to that file) anywhere?
> >
> > Emily
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> >> hi megan,
> >>
> >> we propose development (orange) and test (yellow) sections for the
> >> various sub-corpora in recent Redwoods releases; please see:
> >>
> >>   http://svn.delph-in.net/erg/tags/1212/etc/redwoods.xls
> >>
> >> so, for this release of the WSJ text (DeepBank 1.0), we suggest to
> >> test against Section 21.
> >>
> >> best wishes, oe
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Megan Schneider <caelum at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Has anyone done a train-test split with DeepBank yet? Is there a
> >>> preferred
> >>> test section (or set of sections)?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Megan
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Emily M. Bender
> > Associate Professor
> > Department of Linguistics
> > Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> PD Dr. Valia Kordoni
> Institut  für  Anglistik  und  Amerikanistik
> Humboldt-Universität Berlin
> Unter den Linden 6, 10117 Berlin
> Raum: 2108
> Tel.:  +49/302093-2421    Fax: -2244
> ----------------------------------------
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.delph-in.net/archives/developers/attachments/20130607/b4ea7923/attachment.html>